Below are some helpful resources related to the content in this chapter:
Yale Program on Climate Change Communication provides research-based guidance and tools to help communicators engage diverse audiences on climate issues and features insights on public perceptions (e.g., Global Warming’s Six Americas segments) and practical tips for talking about climate change in polarized contexts, emphasizing shared values and solutions.
Chapter 6. Navigating the Political Landscape
Communicating the mental health dimensions of climate change is both vital and challenging for government officials. This chapter explores how strategic partnerships, professional development, and thoughtful communication can improve the delivery of climate-health messages in politically sensitive settings. Effective action in Canada will require collaboration across sectors, ongoing training for public servants, and carefully crafted outreach that maintains public trust. National assessments have highlighted that expanding communication and outreach, building intersectoral collaboration, and improving mental health literacy and training are key strategies to prepare Canadians for climate-related mental health impacts (1). By leveraging expertise and working across political divides, officials can foster credible, non-partisan dialogue on climate risks and mental well-being.
Building Partnerships for Credible Communication
No single agency can address the complex nexus of climate change and mental health alone. Cross-sector collaboration is essential for designing responses that communities trust. Health professionals, emergency managers, community organizations, Indigenous knowledge holders, and communication experts each have a role to play. Research shows that intersectoral and transdisciplinary collaboration is key to building psychosocial resilience, especially as different partners contribute unique strengths (1) (1). For example, mental health professionals and social service providers are on the front lines supporting people during climate-driven disasters, while local community and faith groups provide social support and cultural context (1). By partnering with these groups, government agencies can ensure climate communications are informed by real-world insights and delivered by trusted messengers.
Collaboration also means engaging those most affected. In Canada, many Indigenous communities have led climate-health initiatives that bridge scientific and traditional knowledge. Partnering with Indigenous and community-led organizations can enhance cultural relevance and equity in messaging. It also builds trust: when people see their own community leaders or respected experts involved, they are more likely to view information as credible rather than as a political agenda. Collaborative networks – such as task forces that include public health authorities, climate scientists, Indigenous elders, and youth advocates – can co-develop outreach materials that resonate widely. Importantly, these partnerships should be fostered before a crisis hits, through ongoing relationship-building and joint planning.
Community-Led Climate Resilience in Selkirk First Nation, Yukon – An Indigenous Partnership
The Selkirk First Nation in Yukon provides a powerful example of cross-sector collaboration to address climate stressors on mental health. As salmon stocks in the Yukon River declined due to climate change and other pressures, the community feared not only for their food security but for the loss of age-old fish camp traditions that are central to cultural identity and emotional well-being (2). With support from a federal climate-health adaptation program and researchers, the First Nation led a project to sustain their fish camps in new conditions. Elders, youth, and local leaders formed a community advisory group to guide the project, ensuring it integrated Northern Tutchone knowledge alongside climate science. Youth participants helped survey fish camp activities and documented elders’ knowledge through interviews and photography. This process taught the younger generation how traditional practices strengthen mental wellness and coping skills in the face of ecological change (2). The collaborative project identified adaptation strategies – from holding on-the-land cultural camps to adjusting harvesting practices – that upheld the community’s mental, physical, and spiritual health. By leveraging Indigenous leadership and external expertise, the partnership maintained credibility with the community and preserved trust. It illustrates how co-creating solutions with those affected can protect psychosocial well-being while adapting to climate impacts.
Training Government Officials and Professionals
Effective communication begins with well-informed and prepared communicators. Government officials, from policymakers to public information officers, benefit from targeted training on climate change and mental health. Professional development in this arena has two important dimensions: building content knowledge and honing communication skills.
Firstly, officials need a solid understanding of the issue – for instance, how climate hazards like wildfires, floods, or heatwaves can lead to anxiety, trauma or community distress. Improving mental health literacy within the civil service is crucial, as it reduces stigma and equips officials to discuss sensitive topics confidently (1). Familiarity with terms like eco-anxiety or solastalgia (grief over environmental loss) helps communicators address public emotions with empathy. Training might involve workshops with psychologists or climate-health experts, briefings on the latest research, or field visits to impacted communities. In Canada, federal programs have started to emphasize capacity building; for example, Natural Resources Canada has funded adaptation training for decision-makers in northern regions that incorporates Indigenous perspectives (3). Likewise, public health agencies encourage mental health first aid training so that officials can recognize and respond to climate-related distress. Efforts to prepare for climate impacts should include training public health and emergency management staff in psychological first aid principles – promoting safety, calming anxiety, encouraging social support, and instilling hope during climate crises (1). Such skills enable government teams to help communities cope in the aftermath of extreme events and to communicate in a compassionate, helpful manner.
Secondly, communication training is essential. Crafting messages about climate change in a way that is clear, factual, and relatable is a learned skill. Governments can draw on the expertise of communication professionals to train spokespeople and staff. This might cover how to translate scientific findings into plain language, how to use storytelling or local examples, and how to tailor messages to different audiences. Communication specialists also coach officials on handling tough questions or misinformation – for instance, how to correct a false claim without alienating the audience. Canadian government communication policy explicitly calls for information to be objective, non-partisan, and clear (). Training can reinforce these principles, helping officials avoid partisan framing and instead focus on shared values. Role-playing exercises, where officials practice delivering climate and mental health messages in mock public meetings or media interviews, can be particularly valuable. They learn to stay on message, project empathy, and build trust even under scrutiny. As climate issues evolve, continuous professional development ensures that communicators remain confident and credible messengers.
Navigating Politically Charged Environments
Climate change can be a divisive topic, and discussions of mental health can also carry sensitivities. When combined, communicating about climate-related mental health impacts requires special care to remain above politics. Government officials must aim to inform and engage the public without being seen as alarmist or partisan. This balancing act involves strategic framing, choosing trusted voices, and upholding transparency.
One effective strategy is to frame climate and health messages around common ground. Rather than ideology, the focus should be on universal values like protecting community well-being, economic stability, and future generations. For example, highlighting how climate impacts – whether stronger wildfires or coastal erosion – can affect anyone’s mental health and quality of life emphasizes that these risks cut across political lines. By centering on people’s safety and resilience, communicators can transcend left-right divides (4). It often helps to cite non-partisan institutions or experts: health authorities, national defense (for security implications), or local community leaders. In fact, studies find that trusted messengers for climate information include health professionals, meteorologists, scientists, and government agencies, whose credibility can persuade a broad audience (1). Inviting a respected family doctor or climate scientist to co-announce a new mental health initiative, for instance, can lend apolitical weight to the message.
Maintaining credibility is paramount. This means consistently using scientifically accurate information and acknowledging uncertainty where it exists. Officials should communicate what is known – for instance, that extreme heat can increase anxiety and aggression – but also be honest about what is still being studied. Transparency about data and uncertainties actually builds trust, as it shows the communicator is not exaggerating or hiding facts (4). At the same time, messages should include constructive guidance. Research warns against focusing on doom and risk alone: fear-based messaging can overwhelm people and lead them to tune out or deny the issue (1) (1). Instead, pair any discussion of climate threats with information on solutions and coping resources. For example, if talking about rising eco-anxiety among youth, also highlight programs that help youth channel their feelings into positive action or provide counseling support. This approach empowers the public rather than leaving them in despair. Indeed, pairing messages about climate risks with how people can support their well-being helps audiences feel more in control and hopeful (1). Hope and efficacy are antidotes to polarization – when individuals believe they can do something about the problem or protect themselves, they are more likely to engage constructively.
Another important tactic is to stay non-partisan in tone and appearance. In practice, this could mean avoiding politically charged language (for example, invoking or attacking specific parties or figures). Government communicators should stick to their role as stewards of public welfare. Using data and stories from across the country – not just one region or political stronghold – can demonstrate that climate-related mental health issues are a national concern. When possible, communications can be issued jointly by officials of different political stripes or with endorsements from all parties, underscoring a unified front. Adhering to the federal communications policy of providing objective, factual information in plain language () is the best defense against accusations of bias. Furthermore, engaging with stakeholders across the spectrum during message development can preempt criticism. For instance, consulting community groups, industry representatives, and advocacy organizations in drafting a climate-health communication plan will help ensure the final messages are balanced and consider various perspectives.
Finally, listening and dialogue are key to navigating controversy. Communication is not just one-way. Governments should be ready to hear public concerns and respond respectfully. In divisive contexts, hosting forums or Q&As (both in-person and online) allows officials to address misconceptions and fears directly. It also humanizes the issue – when people feel heard, they are more open to understanding the information presented. A good communicator in a politicized setting remains calm and empathetic when faced with skepticism. For example, if a community member questions the legitimacy of climate science, an official can acknowledge that it’s normal to have questions, and then provide clear, evidence-based answers (perhaps noting how local weather patterns have changed in ways residents themselves observe). Emphasizing shared goals – like wanting healthy families and a safe community – can redirect the conversation to constructive ground. By approaching even challenging interactions with a focus on respect and solutions, officials uphold the ethical standard of communication that respects diverse viewpoints (4).
In summary, communicating climate change’s mental health implications requires more than just good data – it demands collaboration, training, and strategic finesse. Canadian government officials and their partners can succeed by working together across sectors, investing in professional development, and carefully tailoring their messages for politically sensitive environments. The rewards are significant: improved public understanding, enhanced preparedness, and greater trust in government leadership on climate action. By remaining non-partisan and evidence-based, while also engaging hearts and minds, communicators can navigate the political landscape and foster a united response to the climate-driven mental health challenges ahead.
Chapter Highlights
Cross-sector partnerships enhance the credibility and effectiveness of climate-health messaging.
Training government officials on climate change, mental health literacy, and strategic communication improves public trust.
Frame climate messaging around shared values and non-partisan voices to transcend political divides.
Transparency, empathy, and actionable guidance can help navigate politically charged environments successfully.
Listening and engaging in genuine dialogue with diverse communities builds understanding and reduces polarization.
Find the content of this chapter helpful?
Use the posts above to share key insights from this chapter with your network!